Back to Research

The Liquidity Landscape

Market liquidity—the ability to transact large volumes without significantly impacting prices—has undergone profound changes over the past two decades. The shift from floor-based trading to electronic markets, the rise of high-frequency trading, and regulatory changes have reshaped how liquidity is provided and consumed.

Understanding these dynamics is essential for any systematic strategy, as execution quality can mean the difference between theoretical backtested returns and actual realized performance.

The Hidden Cost

For a $100M equity portfolio turning over 200% annually, a 10 basis point improvement in execution quality translates to $200,000 in annual savings—often the difference between an attractive and mediocre strategy.

Modern Market Microstructure

Several structural changes have transformed liquidity provision:

The Decline of Dealer Inventory

Post-2008 regulations (Volcker Rule, Basel III) have reduced banks' willingness to hold inventory. Market-making has shifted from principal trading desks to agency electronic market makers who provide liquidity but don't warehouse risk. This creates "fair-weather liquidity"—abundant in calm markets, scarce during stress.

High-Frequency Trading

HFT firms now provide 50-60% of equity market liquidity. While they've tightened spreads and improved average execution, their tendency to withdraw during volatility spikes creates liquidity gaps precisely when investors need to trade.

Dark Pool Fragmentation

Institutional trading has increasingly moved to dark pools and alternative trading systems. While these venues reduce market impact for large orders, they've fragmented the price discovery process and made it harder to assess true market depth.

Measuring Liquidity

We track several metrics to assess liquidity conditions:

Execution Strategy Implications

Given modern liquidity dynamics, we employ several execution techniques:

Time-Weighted Execution

For rebalancing trades without strong alpha signals, we spread execution across the trading day to minimize impact and capture the natural liquidity cycle.

Adaptive Algorithms

Execution algorithms that adjust to real-time liquidity conditions—speeding up when liquidity is abundant, slowing when it's scarce—consistently outperform static schedules.

Venue Optimization

Smart order routing across exchanges, dark pools, and crossing networks based on current fill rates and price improvement statistics reduces total transaction costs by 15-25% versus naive routing.

Conclusion

Liquidity is not a static characteristic but a dynamic variable that changes with market conditions, time of day, and macroeconomic environment. Systematic strategies must account for liquidity constraints in both design (capacity limits, turnover constraints) and execution (adaptive algorithms, timing optimization) to translate theoretical edge into realized returns.

SA

Stelios Anastasiades

Founder & Chief Investment Officer at Abacus Wealth Group.